The imputation was done in BEAGLE and for the record I have attempted to see if a non-imputed dataset was different from a imputed dataset as most SNPs in this analysis are imputed and I have noticed a certain "drift" making the imputed individuals more similar to each other than to non-imputed individuals like 1000G individuals. I have therefore excluded all non-imputed individuals except the La Braña individuals assumming that if same minor error affect all individuals the analysis will not be so very wrong. All the genotypes used for the La Braña is actually observed genotypes (no imputation).
As we can see below in the Chromopainter-Finestructure using a selected "world" panel seem to have structuring that make sense both at the World and European level suggesting the imputation have worked well and can be used for further analysis.
CC "World" 183k linked PCA
CC "World" 183k heatmap
We here see again that the La Braña individual seperates strongly from the rest of the modern Europeans as in the earlier post using non-imputed haplotypes. The reason for this appears in world view to be much stronger African ancestry than the rest of the Europeans. The East-Asian, Siberian and Native American affiliation appears to be similar to todays Finns.
The question then further of course what population is the closest to the present day populations. I first run a simple IBS (identical by state) clustering in PLINK and got these distances where in diploid mode sees Lithuanians and Finns on the top while in haploid mode see total domination of Lithuanians.
However from own experience these direct IBS comparisment cant be thrusted fully just by direct comparison as many factors may affect the similarity. I therefore made a new Chromopainter-Finestructure run using only European populations to see if its more information in the data.
CC "Europe" 183k heatmap
As we can see from the heatmap there appear to be affiliation with the Lithuanians, Finns and Basque but more distant to the Saamis, however the large asymetry between CC received and CC donated to other populations gives the earliest branching from the rest of the European panel probably to some extrent because of the minory African admixture detected earlier.
However in the Principal Component analysis or PCA we can disect the different influences seen in the ChunkCount or CC data. We see here first in Dimension 1 or the X-asis that shows the largest variance the La Braña individual on the far left and the Lithuanians on the far right. On Dimension 1 there is no doubt that the Saamis appears closest to the La Brãna and on Dimension 2 that shows the second largest variance is to the Lithuanians. Note that here the Saamis and the Basques form opposites suggesting a North-East vs South-West Component.
However in the Principal Component analysis or PCA we can disect the different influences seen in the ChunkCount or CC data. We see here first in Dimension 1 or the X-asis that shows the largest variance the La Braña individual on the far left and the Lithuanians on the far right. On Dimension 1 there is no doubt that the Saamis appears closest to the La Brãna and on Dimension 2 that shows the second largest variance is to the Lithuanians. Note that here the Saamis and the Basques form opposites suggesting a North-East vs South-West Component.
CC PCA Euro 183k D1-D2
In Dimension 1 and 3 (Y-axis) we see that the La Braña are closest to Finns and to some extent also the Vologda Russians. In dimension 3 we also see that the Basque and the Lithuanians shows opposite variation where the Saamis appears intermediate between the two.
CC PCA Euro 183k D1-D3
The La Braña appears to have a major component that to the strongest extent are found in modern populations among the Saamis but appear rather absent in the rest of the Europeans. The Saamis also appear to have a second component that appears to follow a North-South gradiants also found in larger amounts among the Finns but the La Braña appears here to be much further "South" at the lower end of the Lithuanians in the direction of the Basque suggesting that the La Braña have considerable southern ancestry. Both the components in dimension 1 and 2 are found largest in the northernmost population in Europe the Saami suggesting that there is a second "Northern" component found here not found in the ancient La Braña individuals. The third component seems more diffcult to explain. Here Finns and Vologda Russians appears to show closest variation with the La Braña closer to the Lithuanians while the Saamis appears to pull toward the Basque.
Summit: La Brãna shows a "northern" variation only seen to large extent among the Saamis and at the same time show affiliations toward more southern populations like Lithuanians and Basque. This probably suggest that they had both considerable "Northern" and "Southern" ancestry.
These finding appears at least partly to be in agreement with Vadim Verenich earrlier finding of connection with Saamis and Mesolittic hunter-gatherers:
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar